Acorn User: China

home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search

/ Acorn User: China / Acorn User China CD-ROM (UK) (Disc B) / Acorn User China CD-ROM (UK) (Disc B).bin / STUTTGART / LANG / GOFER / docsrc_doc230 < prev next >

Wrap

Text File | 1994-06-27 | 22.9 KB | 585 lines

.co This is the source form of the release notes for Gofer 2.30 .co .co Mark P Jones June 1994 .co-------------------------------------------------------------------| .>release.230 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- __________ __________ __________ __________ ________ / _______/ / ____ / / _______/ / _______/ / ____ \ / / _____ / / / / / /______ / /______ / /___/ / / / /_ / / / / / / _______/ / _______/ / __ __/ / /___/ / / /___/ / / / / /______ / / \ \ /_________/ /_________/ /__/ /_________/ /__/ \__\ Functional programming environment, Version 2.30 Copyright Mark P Jones 1994. This release is subject to the same conditions of use and distribution as previous versions, documented in src/goferite.h and in the main user manual. Release notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This document is intended to be used as a supplement to the original user manual ``An introduction to Gofer version 2.20'' and release notes for Gofer 2.21 and Gofer 2.28. These notes replace the preliminary version distributed with Gofer 2.30. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: A lot of people have contributed to the development of Gofer 2.30a with their support, encouragement, suggestions, comments and bug reports. There are a lot of people to thank: Jim Blandy Jonathan Bowen Rodney Brown Nick Chapman Derek Charleston Stuart Clayman Terry Dineen Luc Duponcheel Dirk Dussart Sebastian Egner Stephen Eldridge Jeroen Fokker Jeff Fried Andy Gill Michial Gunter Kevin Hammond Daniel Harris Barney Hilken Steve Hill Ian Holyer Richard Jones Fumiaki Kamiya Eak Khoon Hiroyuki Matsuda Sava Mintchev Torben Mogensen Dirk Nehring Chin Wei Ngan Kurt Olender Palle Nielsen Ian Poole Bambang Prastowo Jaan Priisalu Giuliano Procida Jerry Prothero Laurenz Pruessner Niklas R\"ojemo Kristoffer Rose Bernhard Rumpe David Rushall Carsten Schultz Viren Shah Dave Sherratt Guy Steele Jr. Donald Smith Matthew Smith Michael Stout Bernard Sufrin Peter Thiemann Stephen Thomas Bert Thompson Ignacio Trejos-Zelaya Goeran Uddeborg Robin Watts Gavin Wraith David Wright Isii Yuuitirou This also includes the names of people who sent comments and bug reports after the release of version 2.28 and who may not have been credited in previous release notes. The list probably isn't complete, and I apologize if I have inadvertently left your name out. Enjoy! jones-mark@cs.yale.edu (Until mid-July 1994) Mark mpj@cs.nott.ac.uk (From Sept/Oct 1994) .pa .ti Release Notes v2.30 .co-------------------------------------------------------------------| .ST 1. MINOR ENHANCEMENTS AND BUGFIXES The following sections list the minor enhancements and bugfixes that have been made to Gofer since the release of version 2.28. More significant changes are described in Section 2. .ST 1.1 Enhancements ----------------- o A new command, :gc, has been added, making it possible to force the interpreter to carry out a garbage collection. o The infamous `too many variables in type checker' message that has caused problems with some programs, particularly machine generated Gofer scripts like the parsers produced by Ratatosk, should now be a thing of the past. The message may still appear when running such programs on smaller machines where the amount of free memory available for such things is very limited. o It is now possible to compile Gofer without support for old style Dialogue based I/O and, independently, without support for (n+k) and (c*n) patterns. You may take this as a hint that these features may not be supported in future versions, although no firm decisions have been made just yet. o As a convenience, the parser allows constructor expressions of the form (t ->) as an abbreviation for ((->) t). o Tuple patterns (with irrefutable components) are now treated as irrefutable patterns, but without changing the previous lifted semantics. This is marginallly more efficient. It also means that it is no longer necessary to use ~ for generators of the form (x,y) <- expr in monad comprehensions, too avoid restricting the enclosing comprehension to monads with a zero. o Type expressions appearing in primitive declarations may now include synonyms, classes etc. defined in the same script. o Other minor tweaks and improvements. .ST 1.2 Bug fixes -------------- Nobody really likes to dwell on bugs, especially when they have been eliminated. But for those of you who want to know, here is a summary of the bugs discovered and fixed in Gofer 2.30: o Test programs apr*.gs that were included in previous distributions are no longer included in the src directory. These programs were intended only for quick tests, not for public distribution. The fact that some of the test programs (intentionally) caused errors, was a source of unnecessary concern for some since the expected behaviour was not documented. o Some minor fixes to the parser/grammar to give better error messages. o Fixed problems with the :edit command on some machines, particularly noticeable on the RISCOS version. o Large integer constants that are outside the range for Int values are no longer implicitly coerced to type Float. o The implementations of assignment in the LAMBDAVAR and LAMBDANU extensions, and the implementation of the system primitive for LAMBDANU contained subtle bugs that have now been fixed. Note however that these extensions are now regarded as obsolete, and will probably not be supported in future versions. (LAMBDAVAR and LAMBDANU where never formally included as an official feature of Gofer anyway.) o Infix data constructors can now be used in a datatype definition such as: data Tree a = Empty | Tree a `Fork` Tree a o A very subtle bug in the unification algorithm has been fixed. o Some bugs in mildly complicated examples involving pattern matching of integer constants and singleton lists have been fixed. o Fixed some small problems with a couple of the demonstration programs. o Modified prelude definitions of the index function (in class Ix) to include a bounds check. o Other minor bug fixes and tweaks. Someone is bound to find a new one within hours of the release of 2.30, if past experience is anything to go by. If that someone is you, please let me know! .co-------------------------------------------------------------------| .ST 2. LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES This section outlines a number of more substantial extensions that are supported in Gofer 2.30. One of the most important motivations for some of these extensions, and part of an ongoing process, is to provide greater compatibility with standard Haskell. .ST 2.1 Contexts in datatype definitions ------------------------------------- For greater compatibility with Haskell, it is now possible to include contexts in datatype definitions. These are treated in exactly the same way as in Haskell. For example, the only effect of using a context in the datatype definition: data Eq a => Set a = NilSet | ConsSet a (Set a) is to treat the ConsSet constructor function as having type: ConsSet :: Eq a => a -> Set a -> Set a See Section 4.2.1 of the Haskell report, version 1.2, for further details. .ST 2.2 Contexts in member function types -------------------------------------- For greater compatibility with Haskell, it is now possible to include contexts in the type of member function definitions in a class specification. For example, you can now try out the class definition for pseudo monads given in the Yale Research Report YALEU/DCS/RR-1004 entitled `Composing Monads' by myself and Luc Duponcheel: class Premonad m => Pseudomonad m where pbind :: Monad m => p a -> (a -> m (p b)) -> m (p b) Unlike Haskell, Gofer does not make the restriction that the additional constraints on the types of the member functions should not mention any of the types in the first line of the class declaration. This appears to have been a consequence of the formal system underlying the original theoretical work on type classes by Blott. For the qualified type system that is used as a basis for Gofer, such restrictions are unnecessary, although one might argue that they should be retained on stylistic grounds ... See Section 4.3.1 of the Haskell report, version 1.2, for further details. .ST 2.3 Haskell arrays ------------------- For closer compatibility with Haskell, Gofer now supports a built-in implementation of Haskell style arrays. To include support for these arrays, Gofer must be compiled with the HASKELL_ARRAYS flag set to 1. This is the default for all but the very smallest PC version of Gofer. The implementation includes is based on new primitive datatype: data Array a b The array primitives are not currently incorporated into any of the preludes supplied with Gofer. However a separate script file, array.gs, is included in the same directory with the following interface: data Assoc a b = a := b deriving (Eq, Ord, Text) array :: Ix a => (a,a) -> [Assoc a b] -> Array a b listArray :: Ix a => (a,a) -> [b] -> Array a b (!) :: Ix a => Array a b -> a -> b bounds :: Ix a => Array a b -> (a,a) indices :: Ix a => Array a b -> [a] elems :: Ix a => Array a b -> [b] assocs :: Ix a => Array a b -> [Assoc a b] accumArray :: Ix a => (b -> c -> b) -> b -> (a,a) -> [Assoc a c] -> Array a b (//) :: Ix a => Array a b -> [Assoc a b] -> Array a b accum :: Ix a => (b -> c -> b) -> Array a b -> [Assoc a c] -> Array a b amap :: Ix a => (b -> c) -> Array a b -> Array a c ixmap :: (Ix a, Ix b) => (a,a) -> (a -> b) -> Array b c -> Array a c instance (Ix a, Eq [Assoc a b]) => Eq (Array a b) instance (Ix a, Ord [Assoc a b]) => Ord (Array a b) instance (Ix a, Text (a,a), Text [Assoc a b]) => Text (Array a b) instance (Ix a, Ix b) => Ix (a,b) rangeSize :: (Ix a) => (a,a) -> Int For example, to use these primitives in a Gofer session, just include array.gs as the first file that you load, or as the one of the first file names in a project file. Arrays, and the primitives above are supported in both the interpreter and the compiler. Because of restrictions in memory management, the current implementation does not provide true O(1) lookup/indexing in the interpreter or the compiler using the markscan garbage collector. True O(1) access is supported when the twospace collector is used for compiled programs. See Section 6.9 of the Haskell report, version 1.2, for further details about the use of arrays and the primitives described above. Please bear in mind that the current implementation is still preliminary, and may contain bugs. Please let me know if you encounter any problems with it! A few short demo programs are included in demos/arrayEx.gs. .ST 2.4 Monadic I/O ---------------- A preliminary implementation of the monadic I/O is supported, built on top of the framework for lazy functional state threads that has been proposed by John Launchbury and Simon Peyton Jones (PLDI '94). The details of monadic I/O can be expected to change in future releases as a new standard for monadic I/O is established. For the time being, the primitives described here will be of most interest to those looking to experiment with simple monadic I/O and the Launchbury/Peyton Jones system. To include support for monadic I/O, Gofer must be compiled with the IO_MONAD flag set to 1. This is the default for all but the very smallest PC version of Gofer. The current implementation provides several new primitive types: data ST s a -- lazy state threads monad data World -- representation of `the world' type IO = ST World -- the I/O monad proper data MutVar s a -- a mutable variable An interface to monadic I/O can be obtained by loading the file iomonad.gs which may be found in the same directory as the prelude files. This provides the following operations: returnST :: a -> ST s a thenST :: ST s a -> (a -> ST s b) -> ST s b thenST_ :: ST s () -> ST s b -> ST s b seqST :: [ST s ()] -> ST s () newVar :: a -> ST s (MutVar s a) readVar :: MutVar s a -> ST s a writeVar :: MutVar s a -> a -> ST s () mutvarEq :: MutVar s a -> MutVar s a -> Bool instance Eq (MutVar s a) getch :: IO Char getchar :: IO Char putchar :: Char -> IO () putString :: String -> IO () thenIO :: ST s a -> (a -> ST s b) -> ST s b interleaveST :: ST s a -> ST s a There is also a built-in special form, runST expr, which is typed using the rule: expr :: forall s. ST s a (s not appearing in a) ------------------------ runST expr :: a This special form is used for encapsulating state based computations within a purely functional program. See references below for more details. If the version of Gofer being used also includes support for arrays, as described above, you can also use the definitions in ioarray.gs to support monadic array operations: newArr :: Ix a => (a,a) -> b -> ST s (MutArr s a b) readArr :: Ix a => MutArr s a b -> a -> ST s b writeArr :: Ix a => MutArr s a b -> a -> b -> ST s () freezeArr :: Ix a => MutArr s a b -> ST s (Array a b) Some sample programs using the functions described here may be found in the demos/IO directory. For further details about monadic I/O, please consult the papers: Imperative Functional Programming, S.L. Peyton Jones and P. Wadler, POPL '93. Lazy Functional State Threads, J. Launchbury and S.L. Peyton Jones, PLDI '94. See also: Lazy depth-first search and linear graph algorithms in Haskell, D. King and J. Launchbury, 1993. for some very nice applications of lazy functional state threads. All of these papers are currently available by anonymous ftp from the University of Glasgow, ftp.dcs.glasgow.ac.uk. Monadic I/O as described above is supported in both the Gofer interpreter and compiler. No special optimizations are used in the current implementation which should still be treated as preliminary, and may contain bugs. Please let me know if you encounter any problems with it! .ST 2.5 Trace primitive -------------------- A simple trace function, inspired by the original implementation in LML, can now be accessed by including the primitive definition: primitive trace "primTrace" :: String -> a -> a in a Gofer script. When called, trace prints the string in its first argument, then returns the second argument as its result. The trace function is not referentially transparent, and should only be used for debugging, or monitoring execution. That is why it is not included in any of the preludes. Be warned also that, unless you understand something about the way that Gofer programs are actually executed, results obtained using trace may be rather confusing. Because of it's intended use, the trace primitive is not supported by the Gofer compiler, gofc. It is however possible to `hack' in a version of trace for gofc using the external function call mechanism described below with the following C program: #include <stdio.h> #include "/usr/local/lib/Gofer/gofc.h" #define emptyList mkCfun(0) extern Cell primTrace(str,val) Cell str, val; { eval(str); while (whnf!=emptyList) { eval(pop()); putchar(charOf(whnf)); eval(pop()); } fflush(stdout); return val; } See Section 2.7 below for further details. .ST 2.6 Constructor synonyms ------------------------- Type synonym definitions have been generalized to allow arbitrary constructor synonyms such as: type List = [] type Function = (->) type Infer = StateM Int Error Previously, it was assumed that both the constructors on the left and right hand sides were types, i.e. constructors of kind *. This restriction has now been lifted, although both sides are still required to have the same kind. However, the restriction that all arguments to a synonym must be given is still imposed. .ST 2.7 External function calls ---------------------------- The Gofc compiler, translating Gofer programs to C provides a simple external function calling mechanism. External functions are specified using a primitive declaration of the form: primitive foo "bar" :: a1 -> a2 -> a3 -> ... -> an -> r where foo is the Gofer name for the function, bar is the name of the corresponding C function (which must not be a string referring to one of the built in primitives ... if you avoid the `prim' prefix, this should not be a problem), the ai are the argument types, and r is the result type. Arguments of type Int, Bool, Char and Float are evaluated before the bar function is invoked, and their results passed to bar in parameters of suitable types. All other values are passed as unevaluated Cell values. (Special treatment is also provided for arrays, mutable variables, and mutable arrays for versions of Gofer that support these facilities.) Results of type Int, Bool, Char and Float returned from an external function are automatically converted to suitable representations for Gofer. Values of any other type should be passed back as Cell values by the C code for the external function. A result type of the form IO r should be used for external functions that may have some side effects. A result type of the form IO () can be used to call a function that does not return any useful value and is executed only for its effect. Here is a simple example using the external function mechanism. It involves the following short Gofer and C programs: (gix1.gs): primitive howdy "sayHello" :: Int -> IO () main = howdy (length (filter even [1..5])) (cix1.c): #include <stdio.h> #include "gofc.h" Void sayHello(i) Int i; { while (i-- > 0) printf("hello, world\n"); } First, we compile gix1.gs to get a C program gix1.c: machine% gofc gix1.gs Gofer->C Version 1.02 (2.30) ... Reading script file "/usr/local/lib/Gofer/standard.prelude": Reading script file "gix1.gs": Writing C output file "gix1.c": [Leaving Gofer->C] Now we compile the C programs, and link them into a single executable file, ix1: machine% cc -O -o ix1 gix1.c cix1.c runtime.o Finally, we get to run the program: machine% ix1 hello, world hello, world Note that the external function call mechanism described here cannot be used in the Gofer interpreter. The external function call mechanism is a prototype only. It should also be emphasized that we do not, in general, regard the Gofc compiler as suitable for serious applications development. If you want to do something along those lines, try one of the full Haskell systems available (e.g. the Lisp or C interfaces for Yale Haskell, or the C interface for Glasgow Haskell). .ST 2.8 The do notation -------------------- Gofer 2.30 supports a new, experimental syntax for monad comprehensions which we will refer to as `do {...} notation'. The do notation is only supported if the system is compiled with the DO_COMPS flag in prelude.h set to to 1, and the DO_COMPS section of parser.y included. See the comments in these files for further details. The do notation is useful for monadic programming, and requires the cc.prelude, and uses the following syntax: <expr> ::= do "{" <dquals> <expr> "}" -- uses layout rule <dquals> ::= {<dqual> ;} <dqual> ::= <pat> <- <expr> -- generator | <expr> -- command | let "{" decls "}" -- local definitions | if <expr> -- guard With this notation, a guard is written as if <expr>, while a single expression of the form <expr> is treated as a command, i.e. a generator of the form _ <- <expr>. For example, a general version of the filter function can be defined as: myFilter :: Monad0 m => (a -> Bool) -> m a -> m a myFilter p xs = do x <- xs if p x result x If you prefer, this can be written as follows, using explicit layout: myFilter p xs = do { x <- xs; if p x; result x } In standard comprehension notation, this would be written: myFilter p xs = [ x | x <- xs, p x ] Perhaps the most significant difference between these two examples is the fact that the call to result must be written explicitly in the first case. In fact, if the comprehension is interpreted in a monad, m, then any expression of type (m a) can be used as the final expression in a do comprehension. This is useful for describing `tail recursive' procedures. For example, compare: echo' = do c <- getchar if c==EOF then result () else do putchar c echo' with: echo' = [ () | c <- getchar, () <- if c==EOF then result () else [ () | _ <- putchar c, () <- echo' ] ] It is, of course, a matter of personal opinion which of these you prefer. The intention of do notation is to provide a more attractive syntax for monadic programming, to be compared with programs using `bind` in which the example above would be written: echo' = getchar `bind` \c -> if c==EOF then result () else putchar c `bind` \_ -> echo' See which notation you prefer for practical programming, and let me know! .co-------------------------------------------------------------------| .ST 3. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GOFER For those interested in the actual implementation of Gofer, there is a (relatively new) technical report available that describes the implementation of Gofer 2.30: The implementation of the Gofer functional programming system Mark P. Jones Research Report YALEU/DCS/RR-1030 Yale University, Department of Computer Science, May 1994. Copies of this report are currently available by anonymous ftp from nebula.cs.yale.edu in the directory pub/yale-fp/reports, together with a number of other recent reports by members of the Yale Haskell project. .co-------------------------------------------------------------------|